Watched the Ken Ham vs Bill Nye Debate

Sorry I didn’t put a blog up last evening, but was occupied watching the Ken Ham vs Bill Nye Debate on Livestream. It was very interesting. Here is the YouTube of it, if you missed it. I believe it is only going to be available for a few days. (At least on Answers page)

In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. Genesis 1:1 ESV)

*

*

Here is another YouTube of a Post-debate Show by Creationtoday. It is a little shaky at first, but settles down after a minute or so.

*

*

Answers in Genesis

*

7 thoughts on “Watched the Ken Ham vs Bill Nye Debate

  1. Wow! What a debate last night. Ken Ham provided a huge amount of God-honoring truth (and even inserted the Gospel of salvation in Christ a few times)! Bill Nye the Science-Fiction guy rambled about science topics (with reckless assertions, such as assuming that a tree can only grow one growth ring per year, regardless of rainfall patterns!). Nye the Sci-Fi Guy obviously doesn’t understand basic microbiology (demonstrated by Nye’s confusion about asexual reproduction accomplished in bacterial cell division, i.e., mitosis). Contrastingly, Ken Ham countered and refuted every major challenge that Nye voiced (e.g., Ken documenting repeated examples of the hopeless unreliability of radiometric dating as a way to measure time in the unobservable past). Perhaps my favorite example of Ken Ham refuting Nye the Sc-Fi Guy was when Ken Ham provided video clips (and other evidences) showing satellite engineering science technology and medical science technology that illustrated how young-earth creation thinking can and does accompany some of the best scientific analysis and technology that this world has ever seen. So what will happen to sci-fi mouthpiece Nye if a modern hospital’s medical science practitioners tell him that he needs to submit to a medical MRI? Will Nye refuse the diagnostic treatment because he knows that the medical MRI device was invented by a young-earth creation scientist, Dr. Raymond Damadian? Or will Nye be a hypocrite and accept the scientific benefits of creation science applied to real-world medical technology? > JJSJ

    Like

    • Thank you for your great remarks. I thought Ken did a great job. Bill was sticking to a planned message and didn’t seem to want to answer. Especially the issue of Observational and Historical science. He kept blending the two together, whereas Ken kept showing how they are different.

      Like

  2. I am frustrated that Bill Nye is from Seattle. He always did present great science programs for young people, no problems with the program content, until he got into evolution v.s. creationism. Please pray for Bill Nye, ask God to do a work of mercy and grace in his life. Oh, and by the way, GO SEAHAWKS!!!!!!!! Victory parade in downtown Seattle today, February 5.

    Like

    • I read your article, though I didn’t watch the other debate yet. I do believe in Intelligent Design by God, but not the intelligent design taught by those who refuse to say Who the designer is. Also, Ken did not add to God’s Word. Nor is there a gap in Genesis.

      Like

  3. I thought Bill was never going to talk about anything other than the flood. He kept getting hung up on the same thing. There were no fossils at the top because it was not just a rise in water, the water erupted at great forces. Of course he can not understand what God has blinded him from

    Like

Please leave a Comment. They are encouraging.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s